Dialogue principle

In Canadian constitutional law, the dialogue principle is an approach to the interpretation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms where judicial review of legislation is said to be part of a "dialogue" between the legislatures and the courts. It specifically involves governments drafting legislation in response to court rulings and courts acknowledging the effort if the new legislation is challenged.

This approach was introduced by constitutional scholars Peter Hogg and Allison Bushell, and has had acceptance in much of the academic world and in courts. Nevertheless, it remains a controversial principle as it attempts to justify what many critics see as judicial activism in the courts.

Further reading

  • Hogg, Peter; Bushell, Allison (1997). "The Charter Dialogue Between Courts and Legislatures". Osgoode Hall Law Journal. 35 (1). Osgoode Hall Law School, York University: 75–124. Retrieved 9 October 2012.
  • v
  • t
  • e
Constitution of Canada
Constitution Act, 1867
Powers under
Section 91
Powers under
Section 92
  • Licensing
  • Works and undertakings
  • Property and civil rights
  • Administration of justice
  • Fines and penalties for provincial laws
  • Matters of a local or private nature
Amendments and other constitutional documents 1867–1982
Constitution Act, 1982
Part I – Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Part II – Rights of the Aboriginal peoples of Canada
Part III – Equalization and regional disparities
  • 36
Part VII – General
Conventions
Provincial constitutions of Canada
  • Category
  • WikiProject


Flag of CanadaJustice icon

This article about Canadian law is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

  • v
  • t
  • e